|
>> The shared open (also issued in the DAG) does not percolate. Same parameter, same program; different behavior. Not the same program - it has been recompiled as an ILE program running in a NAG and therefore behaves according to those rules. The reason for the difference (my brain is clearer than when I wrote earlier!) is that an OVR is an OS level thing - in other words it just affects the lookup process as does a LIBL. On the other hand a shared open is a sharing of the ODP. Since the ODP is _owned_ by an AG (OVR is a question of visibility not ownership) it cannot be visible to other AGs (including the DAG). And thereby hangs a tail. While we were striving for compatibility - it was compatibility for existing code - run without changes. Not your case I'm afraid. Jon Paris Partner400
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
