RE: Grrr... signature violation

Scott is right, of course... I was proceeding under the assumption that Mike
was not using binder source, I just didn't write it well...

Happy weekend everyone!
:-)

Joel R. Cochran
Director of Internet Services
VamaNet.com
(800)480-8810
mailto:webmaster@vamanet.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Klement [mailto:klemscot@klements.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:22 PM
> To: 'rpg400-l@midrange.com'
> Subject: RE: Grrr... signature violation
>
>
>
> Actually, if you use binder source, CRTSRVPGM won't re-order
> the modules,
> and will work just fine.  I've never used UPDSRVPGM, and I don't have
> signature problems.
>
> On Fri, 3 May 2002, Joel R. Cochran wrote:
>
> > I hate to beat a dead horse Mike, but did you in fact
> CRTSRVPGM after you
> > changed the module?  If so, you could have re-ordered the
> modules which
> > would create a different signature and lead to a signature
> violation.  With
> > Binder Source and UPDSRVPGM you would be able to avoid this
> in the future.
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L)
> mailing list
> To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l
> or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
>