|
No. It has nothing to do with the parameters. You can't change the names of any exports (exported procedure names or variables) or the order of the exports, or add new exports... The real fix to this is to use binding source. Binding source will let you add new exports while still maintaining the old signature. You can then have a "new signature" and multiple "previous signatures", each one corresponding to what the exports were at a certain time. This way, your service programs stay backwards compatable. See the ILE Concepts manual for details. On Fri, 3 May 2002, Wills, Mike N. (TC) wrote: > Help! I have it fixed but know I want to know why and how to prevent it. I > just added a couple lines to my subproceedure, that is it. Then after I > recompiled the module and recreated the service program, I got a signature > violation. After recompiled the calling program it works fine. Do I not > understand how this all works correctly? I thought, as long as I don't > change the parameters, I don't have to recompile all of my programs. Is this > a wrong assumption? > > A very confused Mike
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.