|
Ahh, yes, that would do it. I generally do something like: if ( socket != NULL ) close (socket); NULL in C/C++ being defined as 0 in my implementation. I've never thought about the case where the socket number was actually 0, and it's never come up, I had better double check my code and think about socket number 0. Regards, Jim Langston -----Original Message----- From: David Gibbs [mailto:dgibbs@mks.com] "Jim Langston" <jlangston@celsinc.com> wrote in message 4450A3C6B2D8F940821FB6B28A4D55FE230EC9@MAIL2.celsinc.com">news:4450A3C6B2D8F940821FB6B28A4D55FE230EC9@MAIL2.celsinc.com... > How is it that you are closing socket 0 if you don't have a handle to it? Apparently socket isn't really a handle ... it's *JUST* a number. When my program started, the int variable I use to hold the socket was initialized to zero. Before my program opened up a new connection, it tried to close the current one (because it assumed the previous connection had been closed by the other side). Thus, my program would close socket 0.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.