|
Richard I think your example is "Prettier" too. I would do the same thing even if I had the ability to do longer. John --------------------- >>#WrStout('<option value="' + %trim(IDID) + '">' + %trim(IDNAM) + '-' + %trim(IDID) + '</option>' + nl); Aaron, Personally, I would much rather see it like this: #WrStout('<option value="' + %trim(IDID) + '">' + %trim(IDNAM) + '-' + %trim(IDID) + '</option>' + nl); The option tag isn't a good example of WHY, but when mixing variables and constants, I like to see them on separate lines. personal preference... although, even though I wouldn't use more than 80 (or 40 even) my preference wouldn't/shouldn't exclude you from your preference. Richard B Baird
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.