|
>From: "Smith, Nelson" <NSmith@lincare.com> >Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 16:32:01 -0500 > >Isn't that more due to setting on *INLR? Wouldn't an OPM program work the >same if you return with *INLR off? I'm trying to understand what the >activation group has to do with static variables. Nelson, with regards to static storage, OPM programs do work the same. Where activation groups come in is that each activation group has its own copy of static storage. Mostly this doesn't make any difference. Where it does make a difference is - if the program is in the *NEW activation group, each call to the program gets its own copy of static storage, and you'd see 1 11 1 11 each time - if the program is running in *CALLER, and it gets called by programs in different activation groups, the results would depend on the AG. For example if that program was called from AG1 AG2 AG1, the results would be 1 11 1 11 then 1 11 1 11 then 2 12 1 11. - in error cases, where a program corrupts its own static storage (for example by a parameter-passing mismatch), it's possible for it to corrupt so much storage that it runs into the static storage of other programs. If a program is running in an activation group, it can only corrupt the storage of other programs running in the same activation group. (I just mention this because it's an area where the scope of static storage is a factor; I don't particularly think it's a reason for choosing an activation-group strategy.) Barbara Morris
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.