|
John wrote: >Doesn't the use of GPL significantly limit the number of AS/400 shops that >can use it? I know it's a showstopper for me. And if I can't use it myself, >I can't see why I'd bother to contribute code to it. There are a number of "open-Source" licenses, each with different terms and conditions designed to meet different situations. For example, GPL was designed to encourage the development and sharing of open-source code. But it is indeed restrictive. If you use GPL code in your product, your product must also be licensed under the GPL. On the other hand, there's a less restrictive form of the GPL called LGPL. Under the LGPL, commercial products can link to LGPL code without affecting the license of the product. For example, in the iSeries world, if you developed an open-source library of useful procedures and packaged it into a service program, GPL would require linking products to be GPL. But LGPL would allow use of the service program by anyone, regardless of the license of the product. Mind you, I am not a lawyer. You'd have to consult with experts to check on some of the finer points of GPL and LGPL. Cheers! Hans Hans Boldt, ILE RPG Development, IBM Toronto Lab, boldt@ca.ibm.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.