× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. February 2002

RE: Strange behavior w/%editc()

Through this whole discussion, the point was never brought up...

If you want to use the MOVE opcode, go ahead!  Nothing is stopping you!
It's still there and works like it always did.

"They" are just not moving it to free format, if you want to use free format
use the BIFs, if you still want to use MOVE, do so.

I don't' think it's a matter of IBM "taking out" the move opcode from RPG.
It's just IBM is not making it a part of the free format syntax.

Personally, I have no problem with that.  Personally, I'm glad IBM is *not*
making the MOVE opcode part of free format, I don't believe it has any place
there.

Regards,

Jim Langston

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.