|
Bob wondered: >So are Packed Fields still faster >performers than say Int's on this new >hardware? Anecdotal evidence tells me that Int is the fastest but int's don't work for many business transactions that involve money (decimals) although Binary does. To test my assumptions, I ran some loops with no optimisation. 50k iterations, 500k and 5 million. Times are in seconds. Definition 50k 500k 5m 10s 0 0 3 32 10p 0 1 2 33 10i 0 0 0 1 9b 0 0 4 59 9s 0 0 3 29 9p 0 0 2 30 I won't bother with my machine/memory, etc. because all I'm interested in is the relative difference, not whether an 820 is faster than a P02. Here's sample code: d LIMIT c const(5000000) d start s t d stop s t d diff s 10i 0 d numZ10 s 10s 0 d numP10 s 10p 0 d numI10 s 10i 0 d numB09 s 9b 0 d numZ09 s 9s 0 d numP09 s 9p 0 c eval numZ10 = LIMIT c time start c do numZ10 c enddo c time stop c stop subdur start diff:*s c diff dsply One loop for each "num" D-spec above... --buck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.