× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



James,

If all your programs access the data through the logicals explicitly listing
the fields then you can change the physical and programs using the logicals
will still work even with LVLCHK(*YES).  This method (all data access
through logicals with explicitly named fields) is a good method to make it
much easier to change database files.  You just create a new version of the
logicals and only change the programs that need to access the new field(s).
I am currently working on a new project and this is how all data access is
being done.

Scott Mildenberger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James W. Kilgore [mailto:qappdsn@attglobal.net]
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:28 AM
> To: rpg400-l@midrange.com
> Subject: Re: Externalizing input and output.
>
>
> Here's another thought, if you don't want to go the SQL route, maybe
> someone has already tried this:  Use logical views explicitly listing
> the fields desired.
> One question though, if you run a CHGPF after adding new fields at the
> end, do you still need LVLCHK(*NO) even though nothing in the logical
> has changed?


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.