RE: SETLL not working?...must be me

["Booth Martin" <Booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

oops.

Need to do a reade or read too.  Or a Chain.

--------------------------------------------
Booth Martin
Boothm@Goddard.edu
802-454-8315 x235
--------------------------------------------
-------Original Message-------
From: rpg400-l@midrange.com
Date: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 04:44:01 PM
To: 'rpg400-l@midrange.com'
Subject: RE: SETLL not working?...must be me
%eof doesn't get set by SETLL.
> -----Original Message-----

> From: Booth Martin [mailto:Booth@MartinVT.com]

> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 2:36 PM

> To: rpg400-l@midrange.com

> Subject: Re: SETLL not working?...must be me

>

>

> Try using the %BIF %EOF. I've found it much easier.

> --------------------------------------------

> Booth Martin

> Boothm@Goddard.edu

> 802-454-8315 x235

> --------------------------------------------

> -------Original Message-------

> From: rpg400-l@midrange.com

> Date: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 04:15:56 PM

> To: rpg400-l@midrange.com

> Subject: SETLL not working?...must be me

> i'v stared at this too long now....what am i missing?

> scenario:

> indexed file (JDEdwards F4211LP) with key of:

> account#

> document type

> item#

> date(julian)

> using account# (8,0) for SETLL operation (i.e. partial key)

> key_4211 klist

> kfld a5an8

> Code:

> key_4211 setll i4211

> if not%found(F4211LP)

> (do some stuff here)

> endif

> The code performs as though it FOUND a record, even though i know (and

> DFU confirms it) that there is NO record in the

> file for the selected account number

_______________________