|
Phil, I think it really depends on what existing indices you have built. If you already have an index by field1, field2, then you're better off explicitly ordering the SQL to match the index. I don't believe the query optimizer will normally "imply" a key from the where clause. Eric DeLong Sally Beauty Company MIS-Sr. Programmer/Analyst 940-898-7863 or ext. 1863 -----Original Message----- From: Phil [mailto:sublime78ska@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 6:00 PM To: rpg400-l@midrange.com Subject: Embedded SQL: ORDER BY All, If I do this: select * from file where field1 = '01' and I want to use the order by clause: order by field1, field2 should I include 'field1' on the order by clause or is it unnecessary since I'm selecting 'field1 = 01'? Or does omitting it cause a performance problem? Thanks, Phil _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.