|
I thought a strength of the data q solution is that you could start another instance of the other job and be writing records to the file with each instance? Doubling the instances should halve the performance time? --------------------------------------------------------- Booth Martin http://www.MartinVT.com Booth@MartinVT.com --------------------------------------------------------- -------Original Message------- From: rpg400-l@midrange.com Date: Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:35:36 PM To: RPG400-L@midrange.com Subject: What is faster? Hello! What is faster, to write a record (2000 bytes) to a file with *VARLEN field or to write the same data to a data Q? We have tons of records, at the present we use DQ, while an other job is reading it and writing the record to a file. I wonder if the performance improves if we omit the DQ writing. Any input is welcome. Thanks, Andras _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp _______________________________________________ This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
