|
Hi Barbara, I couldn't help but LOL about your offer for those who disagree -- it reminded me of that company that claimed to have come up with a compression algorithm that would compress any file down to 1KB or something like that by simply compressing it recursively. I don't recall them saying much about uncompressing it <VBG>! Regards, Peter Dow Dow Software Services, Inc. 909 425-0194 voice 909 425-0196 fax From: <bmorris@ca.ibm.com> > >Unless there is a clear justitication > >to the contrary, my vote is to make programs easy to build, maintain, and > >enhance, and if that means wasting a few machine resources so be it. > > I agree 100%. Easy to maintain --> more likely correct. An incorrect > program that runs fast is worthless. (If anyone disagrees, I can make > a compiler that will create every program to run really, really fast, > if it isn't important that it actually does the required job :) _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
