× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



This week I made some changes to a large four screen update program.  A few
years ago, on a CISC machine, compiling this program, which produces a 140
page compiler listing, would take almost an hour.  This week I exited SEU,
changed to another session displaying my spool files, pressed F5 to see the
listing, pressed F5 again and it had finished.  No, I am not really worried
about the difference in cost between MOVE and %editc.

Oh, and why do you think %editc is more complex than %char?  I would think
that %char has more work to do.

Joep Beckeringh'


----- Original Message -----
From: <nb@unitessile.it>
To: <rpg400-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 7:09 PM
Subject: RE: free form alternatives?


>
>
> >> There are two ways to do this today.
> >> 1) Use %CHAR()
> >> 2) Use %EDITC with the "X" edit code.
> OK for %char(), but isn't %editc() a little bit expansive in term of
resource???
> I mean, %editc() seems a lot more complex than the simple MOVE or the
%char()





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.