RE: H ActGrp('QILE') vs H ActGrp(*caller)

["Sims, Ken" <KSIMS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Phil -

>What's wrong with doing RCLACTGRP(user-named actgrp)?

1. I agree with those who think that RCLACTGRP in a production environment
is an accident looking for a place to happen.

2. I would have to have a CL shell for the RCTACTGRP command.

3. If I didn't *ALWAYS* reclaim the activation group, then I would have to
make sure that I use unique activation group names to not reclaim something
that shouldn't be (see #1).

4. The operating system will take care of all of these things for me
automatically with *NEW without the need for a CL shell, without the need to
come up with activation group names, and without the risk of reclaiming
something that shouldn't be reclaimed.

Ken
Southern Wine and Spirits of Nevada, Inc.
Opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent the views of
my employer or anyone in their right mind.