|
>From: "Bob Cozzi \(RPGIV\)" <cozzi@rpgiv.com> >Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 14:09:23 -0500 > >Hey, IBM. >After spending the day converting some old code to more modern looking >RPG IV, I've found that we really need an "Overflow" built-in function. >Something like: %OVERFLOW or %OFLOW(printfname) (I supposed just %OF() >would be good enough too.) >That way I would be able to check for an overflow condition without >specifying the OFLIND(*INOF) keyword on the F spec. Bob, %overflow(file) is a good idea. But in V5R1 you can now specify OFLIND(named_indicator) on the F spec, already giving you a non-*IN solution to the modernization problem. Barbara Morris
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.