RE: CHAIN vs. SETLL

[jerickson@xxxxxxx]

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Consider FEOD opcode,...


Regards,
Jon A. Erickson
Sr. Programmer Analyst
800.COM Inc.
1516 NW Thurman St
Portland, OR  97209-2517

Direct: 503.944.3613
Fax: 503.943.9313
Web: http://www.800.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Langston [mailto:jlangston@celsinc.com]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:43 AM
To: rpg400-l@midrange.com
Subject: RE: CHAIN vs. SETLL


I believe that is only an issue with commitment control enabled, but am not
positive.

If that is an issue, I think it would be the same with both the CHAIN and
SETLL opcodes, no?

Regards,

Jim Langston
Programmer/Analyst
Cels Enterprises, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of Alan Addison
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:36 AM
To: rpg400-l@midrange.com
Subject: RE: CHAIN vs. SETLL


Is there not the caveat to this that records added by other programs since
the file was opened may or may not show up in the resulting operation?   I
seem to remember this bu am not sure about it.

Alan

_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com