F and O specs in Subprocedures?

Hans or Barbara may be able to answer this for me...

Are there any plans on allowing F and O specs inside of Subprocedures?

I know that F and O specs are currently source file wide, we can put 
them at the top above the subprocedures either in programs or in modules
(well, not positive on O specs in modules, never tried that but I assume
it would work).

I sometimes think it would make for better coding to be able to have an
F spec and/or O spec for a subprocedure that isn't utilized in the rest
of the source file.  I guess because when I'm working on a subprocedure 
for a program and I need to check how a file is opened or such I don't
like having to go all the way to the top of my 3350 line program, look
at the F spec, they try to find out where my subprocedure was again.

No, I can not think of any legitimate logical reason for wanting to
be able to code them local to a procedure, I don't see it giving me one
iota of additional capability.  It's just something I think would be 
nice.

And I wouldn't mind at all if we were limited to UsrOpn and Except
processing for these.

Regards,

Jim Langston

Me transmitte sursum, Caledoni!
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---