Re: who wants MOVEA anyway? (was Re: MOVEA -> EVAL)

[bmorris@xxxxxxxxxx]

Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:46:59 -0400
From: jpcarr@tredegar.com
Subject: Re: MOVEA -> EVAL

>>But, I'm still waiting for someone to post an example where using MOVEA
is
>>the best solution :)
>>Barbara Morris
>
>    MOVEA  arr1(n)    arr2(m)

Aw, c'mon, John.  I mean where the whole solution to a programming
problem requires the use of MOVEA at all.  What are you going to do
_after_ the MOVEA?  Are you going to write a loop to mess with the
array and then use another MOVEA to copy it back?  I want an example
where MOVEA is required, not where MOVEA is the best way to do the
function of MOVEA.  (I agree that if (big if) there really is a
reason to use MOVEA, then MOVEA is probably the best thing.)

>Simple easy to read code,  that hides the complexities of the task at hand
>so that the meaning of the "application code"  will not be obscured by
>coding gymnastics.

My awful pointer example was not the true suggested replacement for
MOVEA.  The true suggested replacement for MOVEA is to replace ALL
the code surrounding the MOVEA with a simple string operation.  No
coding gymnastics (which imo includes the use of MOVEA), no pointers
or overlays needed, simple and understandable.

Barbara

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---