RE: *ENTRY PLIST (was: RE: Pointer not set for location .....)

Yes, basically, I assume that if the last one is sent, then all are sent.  I
really started using it when I would have to add a parm to an existing
program, so as not to bomb out if an older program still calls it without
the new parm.  At a previous shop, we had a lot of calls from menus with
parms in them.  Then you had to kick users off to change all the menus that
the program was on.  Not to mention lack of a good program x-ref system like
Pathfinder.  It was as much a time issue as it was keeping older procedures
from blowing up.

Question:  If you say if %addr(parm1)=*null, how does that help with someone
who calls a program with only 2 out of 3 parms.  If they in fact left off
what was supposed to be the first parm, then would not parm2 fall into
parm1's position and parm3 into parm2's?  then parm1 would not = *null, but
contain data that is not relevant to what parm1 is for.

Having said that, I realize my original reply may not apply to the original
message where the user left off a parm on the call.




Joe Giusto II
Programmer/Analyst
Ritz Camera
Beltsville, MD
301-419-3209 x347
410-813-2812 x347

 -----Original Message-----
From:   owner-rpg400-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-rpg400-l@midrange.com]  On
Behalf Of rob@dekko.com
Sent:   Thursday, May 31, 2001 12:43 PM
To:     RPG400-L@midrange.com
Subject:        Re: *ENTRY PLIST  (was: RE: Pointer not set for location .....)


%PARMS again?
Just to rehash an old 'point-of-information', if you have more than one
parm, then I would avoid using %parms.  Because it is possible to omit
passing a parameter withing the middle, while still passing a later
parameter.  This is one good reason to drop using *ENTRY PLIST and use a PI
instead.  If you are addicted to *ENTRY then you may wish to consider
checking each parameter with the following
if %addr(parm1)=*null
* then don't touch this variable!
I used this on a RPGLE program I used as a Command Processing Program with
many optional parameters interspersed.

As far as I am concerned the only good use for %parms is if it is equal to
the total number of parms available then you don't have to check each one
individually.  Or, does it assume that if you send the last parm then you
sent all?

Rob Berendt



+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---