|
>Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 16:31:20 -0400 >From: "Phil" <sublime78ska@yahoo.com> > >I know if I define the pointer outside of the subprocedure that it will work >and I understand why (I understood that before but somehow didn't see what I >did wrong). I now understand also that if I define the pointer as static >that I can define it within the subprocedure. > >What I am working on understanding now is the merits between passing the >pointer to the subprocedure versus returning the pointer to the calling >subprocedure. For that matter, what are the merits of using a return >argument at all? Phil, maybe it was just a slip of the fingers, but it's not the pointer that has to be static. It's what the pointer is pointing to. Barbara Morris +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.