Re: parsing a numeric field (timings) -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

The difference is insignificant.  Replacing 3 Z-ADD's with 3 MOVE's resulted in 
a
30 second reduction in run time.

19:30 for Z-ADD, 19:00 for MOVE to process 141,669 entries.

The original test scenario had a 7,2 field being Z-ADDed or MOVELd to a 5,0 
field.
In my case, both fields were 7,0.

"James W. Kilgore" wrote:

>   Just out of curiosity, since this is on a CISC box, I'm going to
> replace some of the Z-ADD's with MOVE's and see what difference it makes.  
>I'll
> report the results.

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.