Re: eRPG mailing list (was; Future fo AS/400?? )

[Scott Klement <klemscot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I disagree.   If the new mailing list is called "e-RPG", then presumably
its also RPG-based, and you'd get a similar response.

Also, most people associate e-RPG with CGI programming rather than "any
network related" programming, which is one more reason to take my earlier
suggestion and call it "RPG Network Programming" rather than "e-RPG".

Finally -- If you simply asked the question in this manner "I'm writing an
RPG application that uses SOL_REUSEADDR with setsockopt().   What affect
with this have on my sockets?"   I don't think anyone would complain about
it on either this list or a new one if it's created.



On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Rich Duzenbury wrote:
>
> Except that when I ask a socket specific question, such as 'How does the 
> SOL_REUSEADDR socket option affect the behavior of an AS/400 socket',  I'm 
> sure I'll get at least one 'That's not an RPG question -  take it to 
> Midrange-L' response.  So, Make it 51-5.
> 
> Regards,
> Rich
> 
> 

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---