Re[2]: Really big numbers

[D.BALE@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

>> a number greater than 170!

>Dan I believe he is speaking of the mathematical expression (170!)
>which translates into 170 * 169 * 168 * 167 ... * 1. This is used
>quite often in operations research and combinatorial evaluations.

Gee, I thought he was pulling a Chuck Lewis! ! ! <gd&r>

<sigh> I _really_ did know about, um, what do they call those expressions with
the exclamation point after the number?  No matter, but I've never seen a use
for them in a business application system and, so, I didn't recognize the 170!
as an expression.

What about the Java BigDecimal?  How big is it, really?

Dan Bale
IT - AS/400
Handleman Company
248-362-4400  Ext. 4952

-------------------------- Original Message --------------------------
Hello D,

Friday, January 05, 2001, 6:10:00 AM, you wrote:

> a number greater than 170?  How about a 3-digit field?  ;-)

> What?  You work for Microsoft?  170 digits?  Trying to set the world record
> for largest prime number?

>>2,147,483,647 digits

> Um, is this a typo?  How would one even begin to store a number that large?
> That's a one-record, one-field, 2 gigabytes file.  Oh, is it packed?  Sorry,
> just 1 GB.

> Dan Bale
> IT - AS/400
> Handleman Company
> 248-362-4400  Ext. 4952

> -------------------------- Original Message --------------------------
> B,

> Thanks for the suggestion.  Until I read the Class documentation I did
> not realize that BigDecimal can go up to 2,147,483,647 digits.  That
 probably
> fits the problem better than another suggestion to use REX, which works
> fine, but Java is a much more acceptable solution.  I was amazed at how
> fast REX is so I won't rule it out.

> David Morris

>>>> bbrosch@stecnet.com 01/04/01 01:55PM >>>
> BigDeimal in Java.   :)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Morris [mailto:dmorris@plumcreek.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 2:23 PM
> To: RPG400-L@midrange.com
> Subject: Really big numbers


> Math enabled RPGIV'ers,

> What are some of the options for storing and manipulating
> very large numbers where long float is just not large enough?
> In this case to use a number greater than 170!.

> Thanks,

> David Morris

Dan I believe he is speaking of the mathematical expression (170!)
which translates into 170 * 169 * 168 * 167 ... * 1. This is used
quite often in operations research and combinatorial evaluations.

----------------------------------
Eric N. Wilson
President
Doulos Software and Computer Services
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---