RE: Clever UNIX/C Constructs

[Chris Bipes <chris.bipes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

 >> Oh yeah, also performance.  Consider the statements:

 >>       Totals(FindItem('xyz')) += incr;
 >>       Totals(FindItem('xyz')) = Totals(FindItem('xyz')) + incr;

>Isn't that more of a lack of optimization in the compiler and/or optimizing
>tranlator than a performance issue Hans?


In Hans defense:

What if finditem returns the position of the first occurrence on the first
call and the position of the next occurrence on each call their after.

Christopher K. Bipes    mailto:ChrisB@Cross-Check.com
Sr. Programmer/Analyst  mailto:Chris_Bipes@Yahoo.com
CrossCheck, Inc.        http://www.cross-check.com
6119 State Farm Drive   Phone: 707 586-0551 x 1102
Rohnert Park CA  94928  Fax: 707 586-1884

If consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, only geniuses work here.
Karen Herbelin - Readers Digest 3/2000
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---