Re: Subfiles in batch job

[Contractor1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Ah, the memories are coming back. And like I said pointless. I ended up
going with Diane's suggestion of using a physical file with fields named
like the ones in the subfile.

But I am wondering is this a good candidate for what is being discussed in
another thread. Can this program define a data structure similar to the
subfile and define a pointer, then use the ALLOC and REALLOC opcodes? That
would be faster than using the physical file, but still dynamic, right? Of
course, I don't remember the original posting or how the data in the
subfile was being used.

Patrick Conner
www.ConnecTown.com
(828) 244-0822



                                                                                
               
                    Anton Gombkötö                                              
               
                    <gombkoetoe@ASSOF        To:     RPG400-L@midrange.com      
               
                    T.COM>                   cc:                                
               
                    Sent by:                 Subject:     Re: Subfiles in batch 
job            
                    owner-rpg400-l@mi                                           
               
                    drange.com                                                  
               
                                                                                
               
                                                                                
               
                    12/18/00 03:03 PM                                           
               
                    Please respond to                                           
               
                    RPG400-L                                                    
               
                                                                                
               
                                                                                
               


The answer is YES and NO. A batch job can't have screen I/O himself.
You CAN do a OVRDSPF DEV(somedevice) where "somedevice" has to be a display

with sign-on screen which can be occupied. Whenever the job runs it must
have access to this device (so nobody may use it then).

This is more than ugly and a 100% candidate for a murphy attack and should
never ever reach a "production" state.

Anton Gombkötö




+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---