× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Is this the Free-Format that
  • From: D.BALE@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 08:59:00 -0500

PLEASE!!!  ALLOW NO MORE THAN ONE STATEMENT PER LINE!!!

Dan Bale
IT - AS/400
Handleman Company
248-362-4400  Ext. 4952

-------------------------- Original Message --------------------------
At 11/1/00 03:00 PM -0700, you wrote:
>/free
>
>     Read(n) MASTER;
>     If (not %EOF);
>       /copy something
>          For i = 0 to num;
>               x = y(i);
>          EndFor;
>     EndIf;
>
>  /endfree;
>
>There is no shortage of free-format languages that have managed to do the
>job without requiring the programmer to type an explicit end of statement
>character. Why does RPG need one? Think about this folks. EVERY SINGLE LINE
>of code needs the new terminator. How many extra keystrokes will that amount
>to in a given day of coding? And what is it gaining you? NOTHING!

  The only possible "advantage" (in quotes because I see it as enabling
difficult to read code, in most cases) that I can see is that it would
allow multiple statements on the same line.  Otherwise, it's just extra
baggage and s/b eliminated.  My personal opinion is that it shouldn't be
there.  If the design spec says that it *must* allow multiple statements on
one line, then ALLOW its use as a delimiter between statements.  Forcing it
as a requirement seems silly to me.

>One other point that should be brought to your attention is the elimination
>of the GOTO statement from the free-format specifications.

  While GOTO is almost obsolete, there are times when it's the most
expeditious opcode to use, i.e. when maintaining some older, monolithic
piece of code and you need to add a condition that says "we're outta
here".  I see no reason a tag can't be added, similar to DOS's :TAG
structure.  (CL's TAG: structure would probably be problematic, since the
":" is already used as a procedure parm delimiter.)

  -mark
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.