× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Data Structure redefinition
  • From: Jim Langston <jimlangston@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 13:28:14 -0800
  • Organization: Pacer International

Hmm.. I'm not sure if I agree with that statement.  What about this?

D BB          S        10A

D MyStru     DS
D  AA                  10A
D  BB                  10A
D  CC                  10A

Not positive this will compile, but you should get the idea.

This is more commonly seen in File structures, however, but think of
the case where you are using a variable in a Data Structure that also
exists in your file's DDS.

I would not guarantee that AA BB and CC were all stored contiguously with
each other.

Regards,

Jim Langston

bmorris@ca.ibm.com wrote:
> 
> >From: "M. Lazarus" <mlazarus@ttec.com>
> >Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 3:00 PM
> >
> >    Is it possible to have a basing pointer on a DS subfield?  If not,
> why?
> >
> >    What I would effectively like to do is "redefine" DS fields in another
> > DS.  When dealing with outputting multiple "formats" of the same data, it
> > would be much easier to have multiple DS's with different layouts, but
> have
> > the subfields point to the same data.
> >
> >   This would eliminate multiple EVALs and would probably be a lot more
> > efficient, if it can be done.
> >
> >
> > Example:
> >
> > D    DS
> > D A            LIKE( AA )
> > D B            LIKE( BB )
> > D C            LIKE( CC )
> >
> > D    DS
> > D D            LIKE( AA ) BASED( D@ )
> > D         6    INZ( 'Space1' )
> > D E            LIKE( BB ) BASED( E@ )
> > D         6    INZ( 'Space2' )
> > D F            LIKE( CC ) BASED( F@ )
> >
> > C         EVAL D@ = %Addr( A )
> > C         EVAL E@ = %Addr( B )
> > C         EVAL F@ = %Addr( C )
> >
> 
> Mark, it's impossible (in RPG at least) to have a
> data structure whose subfields each have their storage
> somewhere else.  RPG data structures always have contiguous
> storage.
> 
> (I don't know of any language that would allow you to
> have two structures "ABCDEF" and "AB CD EF" where the
> ABs, CDs and EFs are actually the exact same storage.)
> 
> Barbara Morris
> 
> +---
> | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> +---
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.