|
> But aren't you required to write those same lines as PR lines in the > D-specs? The line or two of code you saved in the C-spec (where the action > is) aren't really saved but are moved far away to the D section? True. I'm not really talking about a reduced line count in the source member (although this will still result from using a /COPY member for the prototypes), so much as a tidier program overall. The C-specs are where the program logic happens, and I prefer (relatively) terse code there. Besides, if you have a bunch of calls to the same procedure, you still only need one set of D-specs for the prototype. -- Paul +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.