× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: READE is confusing to me
  • From: booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 03:51:06 GMT

There is a %Hi and %LO to go with %EQUAL?

_______________________
Booth Martin
Booth@MartinVT.com
http://www.MartinVT.com
_______________________




Chris Bipes <chris.bipes@cross-check.com>
Sent by: owner-rpg400-l@midrange.com
09/12/2000 11:05 PM
Please respond to RPG400-L

 
        To:     RPG400-L@midrange.com
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: READE is confusing to me

Yes and No.  Reade indicators are error and eof.  Setll & lookup 
indicators are Hi Lo Eq.  Chain is error and Not Found.  So the biffs fit 
right in.  But I am missing the %high & %low biffs for setll and found.

IMHO
Christopher K. Bipes             Mailto:chrisb@cross-check.com
Senior Programmer/Analyst  Http://www.cross-check.com
CrossCheck, Inc.                  707 586-0551 x 1102
6119 State Farm Drive          707 586-1884  FAX
Rohnert Park, CA  94928

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "M. Lazarus" <mlazarus@ttec.com>
To: <RPG400-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 8:45 PM
Subject: RE: READE is confusing to me


At 9/11/00 08:05 AM -0400, you wrote:
>%Equal is used on Setll or Lookup

  I think that the implementation of these BIFs makes them 
inconsistent.  Even though there was considerable thought behind it, I 
think it ended up being misguided.  I think that they s/b consistent for 
ALL I/O opcodes.  This means that all CHAIN's and READx's should have 
%Found and %EOF available.

  Does anyone else find the implementation confusing?

  -mark


+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: 
david@midrange.com
+---




+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.