Re: Displaying functional value in debug

[jpcarr@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

Buck said;
>>I would define fileAtEOF as an indicator (N),
>>so that later code could use it in the form
>>[if fileAtEOF] without the cumbersome [= 'Y'].

>I agree with you completely.  I alluded to that with the wisecrack about
>indicators.  The example code was cut from an early program, pre-"N"
field.

I've refrained from this thread till now.  I just couldn't help myself
anylonger.

So,  Named variables of the 'Type - N" persuasion are ok to have as your
own EOF flag.
I suppose a good "Named Variable"  Naming convention would be good also,
Unless your naming convention used numbers like  IN30, IN31,IN32, etc

<SEG>
RDLMAO

John Carr

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---