Re: RPT vs RPG

["James W. Kilgore" <qappdsn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jon,

Yes, we checked out the compile directives.  The point is that with either 
option
you -must- make manual changes to every program source member.

IMHO, it is cleaner to have a /COPY member which only has what you want, where 
you
want it.

Jon.Paris@hal.it wrote:

>  >> Since RPGLE is the way to go, we created two /COPY members, one with .....
>
> You can still keep a single source member and use conditional compilation
> directives to ensure that the appropriate pieces go into the right places.  
>You
> still need two /COPY statements but you only have a single source member.
>

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---