|
>> If a key is found and a record is read on a chain/reade the indicator is set off. If a key is found for a setll the indicator is set on. It seems to me that this is the real inconsistency. The original indicator implementation was just plain silly, but maintaining compatibiulity for good or bad will do this to you. >> but I would rather have a consistent representation when the expected operation works or doesn't work. This is exactly why I don't understand your problem with the BIFs. Now that you have %Found (as opposed to no record found) I would have said that have greater consistency. I agree that a general "it worked" indication would be nice, but I suspect they felt that people would want the one-to-one relationship with the old method. +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.