|
I would leave RPG400-L as is. It has been my opinion that _anything_ AS/400 that is not RPG related should stay OFF the RPG400-L list. However, I would not vote for a separate list for _all_ of these, as the traffic probably wouldn't justify it, _and_ there is a common bond here, i.e., if you're doing DDS, you're probably also using Query, CL, SQL, etc. The traffic on MI400-L is sooooooo light (hey, is that list still alive? I haven't seen anything for a few weeks now), but only a select few have any interest in it. Booth makes a good point, though. Currently, some topics are beyond both the scope of my duties and my interest on the MIDRANGE-L, such as anything to do with SMTP, tape drives (or most hardware, for that matter), IPL issues, PTF issues, version/release upgrade issues. Maybe a single, new PROGRAMMING-L list that covers programming issues not covered by any other lists, i.e. RPG, COBOL, MI400. I could go for that. (Look ma! No flames!) - Dan Bale Damnit Simon, you just had to, didn't you! OK, _WHY_ is DOU/IF wrong? None of this, "it just is", stuff. You, of all people, are not a man of few words. (New thread, please.) - Dan Bale (Is it time to go home yet?) > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Coulter [SMTP:shc@flybynight.com.au] > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2000 7:55 PM > To: RPG400-L@midrange.com > Subject: List Usage (was: Seeing a file on the IFS in V3R7) > > > Hello Booth (and David), > > Well COBOL has it's own list, although it's VERY quiet (Is that because > COBOL programmers > are _better_ than RPG programmers and don't have to ask so many questions? > Or just > 'cause no-one uses it? Tongue firmly in cheek!). > > I'd think programming languages are sufficiently different to warrant > separate coverage > -- hence the Java, MI, and COBOL lists. REXX should also have a separate > list if there > is enough activity. > > Perhaps the ideal is a PROGRAMMING list for the CL, DDS, possibly REXX, > OPNQRYF, SQL and > other general programming issues thus leaving MIDRANGE-L for the topics > you suggest. > Even when those techniques are being used in an RPG application they are > rarely related > to specific RPG issues. A general programming list could be used to argue > the DOU/DOW > issue (but not if I'm the moderator** -- and you can take that as me > volunteering for the > job) and other language-independant issues. > > What say you all? Should we separate the topics or alter the function > (and name) of the > RPG400 list? > > I can see Midrange Dot Com taking over from the trade rags ... pity about > the NASDAQ ... > the IPO for Midrange Dot Com would have been interesting :) > > ** A read loop should almost always be a DOW. The issue being currently > argued is really > whether a priming read should be used or a single read in an IF test > inside the DO. I > used to be in the IF camp when I first started programming but after a > while I started > thinking about the construction of the loop and the additional unnecessary > IF test and > changed to the priming read. I know there is nothing worse than a > reformed convert but > those still in the DOU or extra IF camp are simply wrong. You can mask > that with > arguments about religion, style, or "it's always worked for me" but the > fact is it's > wrong. No amount of persuasion from either side will create a convert. > You have to > THINK it through for yourself. ITER and LEAVE (and the appalling LEAVESR) > fall in to the > same category and I've said enough about them in the past. > > Regards, > Simon Coulter. > > «»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«» > «» FlyByNight Software AS/400 Technical Specialists «» > «» Eclipse the competition - run your business on an IBM AS/400. «» > «» «» > «» Phone: +61 3 9419 0175 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 «» > «» Fax: +61 3 9419 0175 mailto: shc@flybynight.com.au «» > «» «» > «» Windoze should not be open at Warp speed. «» > «»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«» > //--- forwarded letter > ------------------------------------------------------- > > X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0a May 4, 1999 > > Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 16:07:06 +0000 > > From: boothm@earth.Goddard.edu > > To: RPG400-L@midrange.com > > Reply-To: RPG400-L@midrange.com > > Cc: none > > Subject: Seeing a file on the IFS in V3R7 > > > > > No. its probably a matter of misunderstanding on my part. I tend to > think > > of the Midrange List as being more for the operations and management > > aspects of the AS/400. For instance, I'd think that list was the place > > for comments and questions about IBM marketing & advertising, security, > > > policy, model characteristics, management and training, connectivity, > the > > internet and software packages. > > > > I think of the RPG list as being more for language and database > questions. > > For instance I would consider this the right list for questions and > > comments about CL, COBOL, DDS, FMTSRC, and REXX, but not Java or > > Code/400. > > > > _______________________ > > Booth Martin > > boothm@earth.goddard.edu > > http://www.spy.net/~booth > > _______________________ > +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.