|
We have something similar here, but instead of breaking down to lines, we opt for a varying length field with a reserved length equal to a couple of lines. Now if you want to parse to separate lines, try this: c Eval StrPos = 1 c Eval EndStr = StrPos + MaxLen c ' ' CheckR String:EndStr EndPos c Eval Len = EndPos - StrPos + 1 c Eval FileFld = %Subst(String:StrPos:Len) This will find the first logical break in the line. You can then recalculate the start/end/len until you reach the end of the data. Christopher K. Bipes mailto:ChrisB@Cross-Check.com Sr. Programmer/Analyst mailto:Chris_Bipes@Yahoo.com CrossCheck, Inc. http://www.cross-check.com 6119 State Farm Drive Phone: 707 586-0551 x 1102 Rohnert Park CA 94928 Fax: 707 586-1884 If consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, only geniuses work here. Karen Herbelin - Readers Digest 3/2000 -----Original Message----- From: dmosley@dancik.com [mailto:dmosley@dancik.com] Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 6:27 AM To: RPG400-L@midrange.com Cc: terry@dancik.com Subject: A little RPG and a little CGI/Net.Data question. Alright Mr. Stone, let's see you shine. Here's my situation. I am creating a <TEXTAREA COLS=50 ROWS=10>, in HTML obviously, to allow users to enter comments in. Once the user has submitted his/her entree, and continues to the next URL, which is accessed via Net.Data, I do a @DTW_directcall function that passes the users comments and the comments length to an RPGLE program, using simple parameter pass. The program should read the comments entered and break them down and written to a physical file. The file layout is as such. SEQ#- 3,0 & TEXT - 50a. The comments should be broken so that each row entered would be considered a SEQ# increment. My problem is breaking down the comments, once it is passed to the RPGLE program. I created a procedure that I thought would break it down properly, BUT, the comments value being passed to the program does not appear to have Carriage Returns (\n)(x'15'), so I can't figure out were to %subst the comments to a new record. Ex) TEXTAREA : PHYSICAL FILE RECORDS (What records should be written) COMMENTS SEQ# TEXT ROW 1 : This is were the comments would go. 1 This is were the comments would go ROW 2 : ROW 3 : This would be considered SEQ# 3. 3 This would be considered SEQ# 3. ROW 4: ROW 5: And this would be considered SEQ# 5. 5 And this would be considered SEQ# 5. I hope that this explained it well enough for you all. Any suggestions would be greatful. thanks dave +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.