Re: File and Program field definition

[Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sideline:   *entry plist can be replaced by a PI definition.  See 
page 36 of the Redbook 3.3.2 Procedure-interface definitions.  I 
will admit that I put a comment that says something like 'replaces 
*ENTRY PLIST' for the blokes who scan for *ENTRY with their editor.





Yuriy_Simonoff@WHJI.COM on 04/10/2000 10:35:28 AM
Please respond to RPG400-L@midrange.com@Internet
To:     RPG400-L@midrange.com@Internet
cc:      
Fax to: 
Subject:        Re: File and Program field definition



 no it didn't define it as a CONST. There is no PI definition, because it
is external pgm with PLIST:

065.00 C     *Entry        Plist
066.00 C                   Parm                    PLU
067.00 C                   Parm                    Value

and variables defined in the programs as:

0021.00 D PLU             S             11S 0
0022.00 D Value           S              5S 0





rpg400-l-owner@UUCPHOST.MCS.NET on 04/07/2000 05:54:13 PM

Please respond to RPG400-L@midrange.com

To:   RPG400-L@midrange.com
cc:    (bcc: Yuriy Simonoff/WHJI)

Subject:  Re: File and Program field definition




Does the procedure interface (PI) on the called program defined it as
CONST?





Yuriy_Simonoff@WHJI.COM on 04/07/2000 04:45:04 PM
Please respond to RPG400-L@midrange.com@Internet
To:  RPG400-L@midrange.com@Internet
cc:
Fax to:
Subject:  File and Program field definition



I've got something weird.

1. There is an external program that is defined to the calling program
through procedure prototype as:
54+D GetCoupon       PR                  extpgm('ZED005')
55+D PLUParm                       11S 0
56+D ValueParm                      5S 0

*** note PLUParm parameter.

2. There is a file that has PLU defined as:
0012.00      A            S01PLU        11S 0       COLHDG('COUPON PLU')

3. In the program I call procedure as:
0186.00 C                   CallP     GetCoupon(S01PLU:CouponValue)


4. Compiler gives me an error:
*RNF7535 30      1 The type and attributes of the parameter do not match
those
                   of the prototype.

5. Looking at compiler listing I see that S01PLU field is defined as
packed:
0008.36          S01PLU            P(11,0)

6. This field is defined ONLY in the file and in the program it gets only
referenced.

Does anybody have an explanation for this phenomena?



+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---


+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---







+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---