× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




     Alternative....... Use C function "system" which executes in the 
     same call level as the invoking program. The prototypes for this 
     have been delivered to the list several times. I am starting to use 
     this all the time. Better yet, it requires nothing but the command 
     string to be passed, and you can get the error message id if the 
     command fails with a simple include of a C runtime variable. 
     
     eric.delong@pmsi-services.com 


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: CALLB vs.CALLP 
Author:  <RPG400-L@midrange.com> at INET_WACO
Date:    3/31/00 1:06 PM


     
The problem I always have with using a subprocedure as a wrapper for 
QCMDEXC is the call level.   When I do an OVRDBF or similar command 
via my subprocedure, it doesn't work because its at a different call 
level.
     
Sure, I could do OVRSCOPE(*JOB)  but thats not a very elegant solution!
     
So, I usually do a prototype with a CONST parameter for the command and 
the length.  Then I can do something like this:
     
C               callp     Cmd('OVRDBF FILE(FILEONE) TOFILE(FILETWO)': 200)
     
I would certainly PREFER to not pass the length -- but havent found a good 
way.   What am I missing?
     
     
     
     
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Stone, Brad V (TC) wrote:
     
> I never understood this example, and I've seen it from a lot of people.  If 
> you're making a subprocedure, prototype it so you only send the command.
> Not the length.  You can define the length as %size(Command) in the 
> Subprocedure.
> 
> Then, you only need to do..
> 
> CALLP          #QcmdExc('CLRPFM FILE1') 
> 
> Much easier.  And only 2 more seconds of setup. 
> 
> Other times you will definatly want to do this when making wrappers for 
> APIs.  Sometimes they have a lot of parms you don't need to pass.  The 
> command length on QCMDEXC is one of them.
> 
> Brad
     
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. 
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com 
+---
     


+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.