× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: CALLB vs.CALLP
  • From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:00:13 -0500

Prototyped calls take a little more setup.  However, they do give 
you some advantages.  One is consistancy.  Two is the ability to do 
calcs and stuff.

For example 
<< source member STDCOPY in QRPGLESRC in library MYCOPY >>
D qcmdexc         PR                  EXTPGM('QCMDEXC')      
D  cmd                       32702A   CONST OPTIONS(*VARSIZE)
D  cmdlen                       15P 5 CONST                  
<< end of above source >>

The CONST will allow you to work with mismatched parameters by automatically 
remapping them.
For example
<< source member PGM in QRPGLESRC in library MYLIB >>
 /COPY MYCOPY/QRPGLESRC,STDCOPY                                            
D mycmd           C                   'OVRDBF INPUT TOFILE(MYLIB/FTPSCRPT)'
D CmdLen          S              3P 0 inz(35)                              
C                   callp     qcmdexc(mycmd:CmdLen)                        
 * Notice that CmdLen is defined as 3,0 but it still works.
 * We could skip the garbage of determining the size for CmdLen and 
 * simply do the following:
C                   callp     qcmdexc(mycmd:%len(%trim(mycmd)))
 * Or even:
C                   callp     qcmdexc('OVRDBF INPUT TOFILE(MYLIB/FTPSCRPT)':
C                                     %len(%trim('OVRDBF INPUT 
TOFILE(MYLIB/FTPSCRPT)'
C                                     )))
 * We could also nest functions.  On this example I am leaving out
 * the prototypes.
 * DayOfW determines a numeric day of the week
 * DayName takes this number and returns a name for this number.
C                   eval      Text=DayName(DayOfW(datefield))





mwalter@netrax.net on 03/31/2000 10:40:42 AM
Please respond to RPG400-L@midrange.com@Internet
To:     rpg400-l@midrange.com@Internet
cc:      
Fax to: 
Subject:        CALLB vs.CALLP

Is there an advantage of CALLP over CALLB when not returning a value?
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.