× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Indicator enhancements
  • From: Gary Guthrie <GaryGuthrie@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2000 15:39:27 -0600



> bmorris@ca.ibm.com wrote:
>
> Gary, I understand what you're getting at now, but this only makes
> sense when you have 2 (3? using *OFF? 4? *ON) categories of return code.
>

Actually, it makes sense when you multiple posibilities that fall into a
single category. For instance, a negative number could indicate an error
category -- any error. So for instance, your procedure might have the
following as possible error return codes:

-1 = Error condition 1
-2 = Error condition 2
-3 = Error condition 3
-4 = Error condition 4
-5 = Error condition 5

> Anyway, what's the difference between what you are suggesting and
> coding if "rc < 0"?  Or, coding if "isError(rc)"?
> 

Here's a couple of examples code snippets. You tell me which is more
intuitive as you're just reading through code.

Example A:

 ...
C              Eval     RtnCode = MyProc( MyParm )
C              Select
C              When     RtnCode > 0
 ...
C              When     RtnCode = 0
 ...
C              When     RtnCode < 0
 ...
C              EndSl



Example B:

 ...
C              Eval     RtnCode = MyProc( MyParm )
C              Select
C              When     RtnCode = ExistingCust
 ...
C              When     RtnCode = NewCust
 ...
C              When     RtnCode = Error
 ...
C              EndSl



> Come to think of it, maybe I don't understand what you're suggesting
> now.  Do you want to return specific return codes in an indicator
> and have the values compare equal/not-equal to *NEGATIVE and
> *POSITIVE, and also have them containing more specific values?

They're not supposed to be indicator fields. It's actually numeric
fields. Cut and paste woes!

Maybe we need an IS construct.

C              When     RtnCode Is ExistingCust


Gary Guthrie
REAL Solutions Technical Support
Technical Editor, NEWS/400 magazine
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.