|
Seems open to interpretation, but my definition of any %int function would be "the integer portion of". By this definition, -8 is correct. "The next smallest integer" seems a tad arbitrary to me. -- Paul Cunnane ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: RE: int(-8.9)=-9 or -8 Author: "Laskosky; Matt" <MLaskosk@kmart.com> at InterNet Date: 2000-03-02 6:36 am And Perl returns -8, and according to my instructor this is correct since the function of %int(-8.9) is to return the integer value of the number w/o first rounding the number. Who's right? +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.