Re: Meaningful Procedure names

["Joe Teff" <joeteff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>Joe wrote:
>>I get the impression that you do not consider the long name
>>capability either neccessary or desirable. I agree that long
>>names for the sake of long names is unproductive and can
>>make code harder to read, rather than easier. On the other
>>hand, there are times that restricting your name to 6, 10 or
>>12 charcters does the same. I rarely go over 12, but there
>>are rare occasions when I use 15-20 charaters because it
>>causes the code to be easier to understand.
>
>Do I really need to add a smiley every time I try to
>have a little fun?


Sorry. I was baffled by your remarks and was unsure if it
was suppose to be humorous. I initially deleted the message
and then later went back to the trash folder to respond. It's
hard at times to understand written text unless you know the
other person's personality.

Joe

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---