Re: Design question re: SrvPgm Modules & Procedures

[Don <dr2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Paul,

keep in mind that TAATOOLS has a scramble already...you may find it
convenient to just modify that one with your own algorithm...

Don in DC

On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Paul Jackson wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I will soon be writing a set of procedures to do Scrambling/Descrambling of
> data. This will be available by two procedures Scramble & Unscramble which
> will be able to be embedded within Eval statements.
> 
> Both Scramble & Unscramble will be calling Procedure A twice and Procedure B
> once to do their necessary processing.
> 
> I plan to have all of these procedures in the same service program, let's
> say srvpgm=SCRAMSRV
> 
> So within SCRAMSRV I will have the following procedures:
> 
> Scramble -- available outside srvpgm
> Unscramble -- available outside srvpgm
> ProcA
> ProcB
> 
> My question is: Should I have these procedures in separate source members
> and compile as separate modules or should I throw everything into one source
> member?
> 
> Advantages/Disadvantages of either method?
> 
> I am fairly new to ILE and so could do with a few pointers here.
> 
> Thanks in advance for any advice.
> 
> -Paul Jackson 
> 
> +---
> | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> +---
> 

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---