× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Exception vs function-check; ILE vs OPM
  • From: "Peter Dow" <pcdow@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 16:47:14 -0800

Hi Jon,

Thanks for the response - it still has me puzzled, because what you say is
exactly what I thought, and the manuals also seem to say that.

The program was compiled with DFTACTGRP(*YES), which therefore precludes
specifying anything for ACTGRP. When I display the program I see:

Activation group attribute . . . . . . . . . . :   *DFTACTGRP
Shared activation group  . . . . . . . . . . . :   *NO

I don't see anything on the CRTBNDRPG or CHGPGM commands that lets me
specify shared act.grp *YES, although it does sound like it should be *YES.

The call stack when the menu program is executing is:

       Program
Rqs    or          ---Activation Group---
Lvl    Procedure   Number      Name
       QCMD        0000000001  *DFTACTGRP
       QUICMENU    0000000001  *DFTACTGRP
  1    QUIMNDRV    0000000001  *DFTACTGRP
  2    QUIMGFLW    0000000001  *DFTACTGRP
  3    QUICMD      0000000001  *DFTACTGRP
  4    QCMD        0000000001  *DFTACTGRP
       QUOCPP      0000000001  *DFTACTGRP
       QUOMAIN     0000000001  *DFTACTGRP
  5    QUOCMD      0000000001  *DFTACTGRP
     < EP_GPRM950  0000000002  *DFTACTGRP
       GPRM950     0000000002  *DFTACTGRP
     < X_WS_EXFMT  0000000002  *DFTACTGRP
       QWSGET      0000000001  *DFTACTGRP
       QT3REQIO    0000000001  *DFTACTGRP

I'm unable to capture it at the moment when CHGDTA is executing.

Any other ideas?

Peter Dow
Dow Software Services, Inc.
909 425-0194 voice
909 425-0196 fax


----- Original Message -----
From: <Jon.Paris@halinfo.it>
To: <RPG400-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: Exception vs function-check; ILE vs OPM


>
>
> Peter,
>
> I didn't respond to your original note 'cos I figured that either Hans or
> Barbara would do a better job than me.
>
> First comment - are you certain that the RPG IV version using DFTACTGRP
*YES
> behaves differently?  It should be exactly the same as OPM RPG.  The
differences
> in error handling should only cut in when  DFTACTGRP *NO is used.  I would
> suggest you re-try the RPG III version under the same conditions and make
sure
> it is behaving the way you think.  If it does, check RPG IV with *YES - it
> should be the same.
>
>
> +---
> | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
> +---


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.