RE: S/36 F-spec allowed dotted names? was: EXTNAME questions...

[Chris Bipes <rpg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree.  That was the point I tried to make earlier in this thread.  If a
file object can be created, the F spec should be able to reference it.

Christopher K. Bipes     mailto:ChrisB@Cross-Check.com
Sr. Programmer/Analyst   mailto:Chris_Bipes@Yahoo.com
CrossCheck, Inc.         http://www.cross-check.com
6119 State Farm Drive    Phone: 707 586-0551 x 1102
Rohnert Park CA  94928 Fax: 707 586-1884

*Note to Recruiters
Neither I, nor anyone that I know of, is interested in any new and/or
exciting positions. Please do not contact me.


-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Bale [mailto:dbale@genfast.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 1999 10:19 AM
To: rpg400-l@midrange.com
Subject: Re: S/36 F-spec allowed dotted names? was: EXTNAME questions...


BTW everybody, I am _not_ complaining here about RPG F-spec restrictions on
the
file name.  I would never use dots or underscores to name an AS/400 file
object.
But why would RPG-IV, which will never see the light of day on another
platform,
be more restrictive than the OS on file names?

- Dan Bale
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---