|
Floating point makes a lot of thing easier, BUT, even with 17 digits you can get very naughty surprises in some calculations. I belive that for comercial purposes, where we deal with accountants that "count" and do not "measure", then fixed point arithmetic is the proper tool. _____________________________________________________________________ boldt@ca.ibm.com wrote: > > Eric wrote: > >Again you would be better served by using floating point numbers in this > >situation (That is why your calculator is floating point) at the end you can > >resolve it to a fixed point number by a simple rounding operation. > > I would be very leery about recommending the use of floating > point, especially when dollar amounts are involved. There > are the the concerns with rounding to get proper answers, > along with the limit of 16-17 digits maximum precision. <snip> -- Raul A. Jager W. Asuncion - Paraguay +--- | This is the RPG/400 Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.