Re[4]: LVLCHK *NO

[pcunnane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

     All the more reason to recompile all the programs.
     
     If a file is used by 200/300 programs, I think anybody should think 
     twice about arbitrarily changing the layout.  And if, on mature 
     reflection, the change is necessary, then by all means all the 
     programs should be recompiled.
     
     ____________
     Paul Cunnane
     The Learning Company


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: Re[2]: LVLCHK *NO
Author:  Colin Williams <Williamsc@technocrats.co.uk> at InterNet
Date:    01-10-99 4:06 pm


What if that change involves 200/300 programs or even more?
     
>-----Original Message-----
>From: pcunnane@learningco.com [mailto:pcunnane@learningco.com] 
>Sent: Friday, October 01, 1999 7:17 PM
>To: 'RPG400-L@midrange.com'
>Subject: Re[2]: LVLCHK *NO
>
>
>     In my last job, which was in a software house, LVLCHK(*NO) was 
>     strictly verboten.  If a file had to be changed - even to tack a 
>     single field on the end - all relevant programs were 
>tracked down and 
>     recompiled.  All such programs then became part of the fix to be 
>     delivered.
>     
>     ____________
>     Paul Cunnane
>     The Learning Company
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---