Re: RPG IV and CF-spec "keep it IBM"

Bob,

>Would you implement a feature as questionable as the CF-spec, with only 5
>out of 50 replies? Interesting.

Consider that, of Jon's collected responses, those 5 represented 10%
who voted for CF _even at the full $100 cost_ when it meant using the
entire budget amount.

Hans has already indicated that the actual cost will come in around
$20.  Noone can predict with certainty how many people would have
voted for CF if the original poll had projected the cost at $20 of a
$100 budget allowance.  But I think it is fair to say that more than 5
out of the 50 would have done so.  Granted, it still wouldn't have
been 100%, assuming you were still voting.

Hans also indicated they went ahead with the study to determine the
real cost because they "thought it was the right thing to do".  And I
have to admit, I agree. <g>

Doug
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---END