• Subject: Re: Thanks! (was: RE: Use of DUMP in production programs)
  • From: boldt@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 07:48:30 -0400



Mark wrote:
>>After a bit of discussion with my colleague,
>>Barbara, we decided to go with a new operation
>>extender on the DUMP opcode.  This offers the
>>most flexibility:  You can code DUMP for
>>debugging purposes, and you can code DUMP(A)
>>to always produce a dump, even if DEBUG(*YES)
>>is not coded.
>
> Will this print unreferenced variables?  If not, can you add an extender
>to print them too?

If you want the proper values of unreferenced variables
dumped, code DEBUG(*YES).  An extender on one opcode is
not going to change the way input fields are extracted.

Cheers!  Hans

Hans Boldt, ILE RPG Development, IBM Toronto Lab, boldt@ca.ibm.com


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* This is the RPG/400 Discussion Mailing List!  To submit a new         *
* message, send your mail to "RPG400-L@midrange.com".  To unsubscribe   *
* from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify       *
* 'unsubscribe RPG400-L' in the body of your message.  Questions should *
* be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com          *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].