Re: Re-key PF or LF

[boothm@xxxxxxx]

51 records in all? then perhaps just load an array with the key, and an 
alternating array with the data, then do a look up (not a SORTA) on the array?  
That'd work if someone else doesn't have a better idea on using OPNQRYF.

In <199810141530.QAA20645@mailhost.dircon.co.uk>, on 10/14/98 
   at 04:20 PM, ikat@dircon.co.uk said:

>Hello -- here is a little question for all you out in AS/400 land.

>Is there a way to key a PF without using a LF and not putting K spec in
>the PF ?

>Heres what I got.
>1 PF that has over 14000 records in it, of which I want 51.
>so I crtdupobj, and sql the records I need. The RPG prog then  needs to
>read this file with keys. but there arn't any ! Must I  create a temp LF
>or is there a way of using opnqryf (or something) that can put the keys
>into the PF.

>Hope this makes sense :)
>Marc Woodbridge.

>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>* This is the RPG/400 Discussion Mailing List!  To submit a new         *
>* message, send your mail to "RPG400-L@midrange.com".  To unsubscribe   *
>* from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify       *
>* 'unsubscribe RPG400-L' in the body of your message.  Questions should *
>* be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com          *
>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
boothm@ibm.net
Booth Martin
-----------------------------------------------------------

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* This is the RPG/400 Discussion Mailing List!  To submit a new         *
* message, send your mail to "RPG400-L@midrange.com".  To unsubscribe   *
* from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com and specify       *
* 'unsubscribe RPG400-L' in the body of your message.  Questions should *
* be directed to the list owner / operator: david@midrange.com          *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *